Chevrolet’s LT1 engine family evokes all kinds of emotions among Bow-Tie guys.
Those in the know remember the original 350 cubic-inch LT1 introduced in 1970 was a real powerhouse with a hot mechanical cam and 370 horsepower on tap from the factory.
It was the last really hot Chevy small-block ever done, with the exception being the high-revving Trans Am-inspired 302 c.i.d. Z28 in 1969. The 350 LT1 rocked. In the years to follow, the LT1 lost adrenaline to tough federal emission standards and higher auto insurance rates. By the mid-1970s, the honeymoon was over.
As the 1980s unfolded, performance became more in style, with Chevrolet leading the pack in that age-old battle with Ford. Those fuel-injected 5.0L Mustangs were a force to be reckoned with and Chevrolet was paying close attention. Chevrolet brought us Cross-Fire injection in 1982, which didn’t impress anyone. In the mid-1980s, GM brought us Tuned Port Injection (TPI), which was tunable and certainly a smashing success. TPI endured and remained an industry standard for years.
The redesigned Gen. II LT1 Chevrolet small-block (L98) introduced in the 1992 Corvette was an updated version of the time-proven small-block first introduced in 1955 with its share of interesting refinements—some quite controversial.
The cam-driven water pump with reverse-flow cooling and OptiSpark ignition system were revolutionary. However, OptiSpark has always been problematic. It has also been refined and improved by both GM and the aftermarket. MSD, as one example, offers a terrific OptiSpark replacement distributor as does Accel.
You can even retrofit the LT1/LT4 with a cool LS coil-on-plug ignition system and eliminate OptiSpark entirely.
The Lingenfelter Performance Engineering coil-on-plug conversion solves the OptiSpark ignition issues. The LT1 coil-on-plug converters with adjustable retard and intelligent rev limiter still use the optical module in the OptiSpark distributor, but without high-voltage passing through it.
Inside the LTCC package, you have the LTCC module and the harness with eight leads, each with a Weatherpack connector and ground wire, a pigtail connector, and four non-harnessed wires. There are plenty of OptiSpark ignition choices to meet your ignition needs.
The LT1 engine in displacements of 265 and 350 cubic inches was employed in a number of General Motors vehicles including the 1992-’96 Corvette, 1993-’97 Camaro and Firebird, 1994-’96 Chevy Caprice and Impala, Buick Roadmaster, and the beasty Cadillac Fleetwood luxury rides.
What made the LT1 series so successful was greater amounts of power by yielding a broader torque curve enabling full-sized luxury cars to accelerate aggressively to speed onto the freeway. In performance vehicles like the Impala SS, Camaro, and Firebird, it roared out of traffic lights in an inspiring fashion. It rocked. What’s more, there was so much you could do with it in terms of performance.
Let’s Get to It
We’re working with a 1996 vintage LT1 block, identifiable by its “327” visible in the block and a casting number of #10125327 for the 5.7L V8 with a 4.000-inch bore.
This block casting was used from 1992-97. There’s only one other LT1 block casting numbered #10168588 for the smaller bore (3.736-inches) L99 4.3L V8 (265 c.i.d.), which was available in the Caprice as the base V8. What we’re about to do here applies to both the 350 and the 265.
What makes the 1992-97 LT1 block different from the traditional Chevy small-block is what it has—and what it doesn’t have. It doesn’t have an accommodation for a distributor like most Chevy small blocks. Instead, it has an oil pump drive stuffed in the block in back secured by a single bolt. The LT1 block really is an entirely different block and needs to be treated as such. Some items are interchangeable—some are not. Intake manifolds, as one example, are not.
L&R Engines of Los Angeles, CA provided us with a standard bore LT1 5.7L block bored and honed .030-inch oversize (4.030”). The block has been professionally cleaned, prepped and machined for this build effort. This block has been line-honed, bored and honed, and the decks cut to give us a clean, crisp, ready to assemble short-block.
When Chevrolet introduced the 300-hp LT1 (Gen. II) fuel-injected small-block in 1992, it was a more-advanced 350 c.i.d. Chevrolet V-8 small-block, which was a cut above the Tuned Port Injection small-block first introduced in 1984.
TPI set a new benchmark for performance when it debuted in the all-new 1984 Corvette and the white-hot 1985 IROC-Z Camaro. It offered incredible performance coupled with something unheard of with high-performance V8 engines of the era—fuel economy. Port fuel injection coupled with aggressive roller tappet technology made the TPI a quantum leap in performance. No one did it better than Chevrolet.
The new Chevy Gen. II LT1 took TPI to the next level with features that made it a vastly improved small block. The objective was reduced emissions and greater amounts of power. GM did away with the belt-driven water pump and rear HEI distributor—replaced with a camshaft-driven, reverse-flow water pump, and OptiSpark ignition.
OptiSpark was a pancake-style, light-triggered electronic distributor located beneath the cam-driven water pump. There were two types of OptiSpark ignition systems. There was the unvented (1992-’94) and vented (1995-’97). You will want the vented OptiSpark.
A reverse-flow cooling system was conceived to compensate for the much higher 10.5:1 compression ratio long with leaner fuel mixtures to clean up emissions. Reverse-flow became the standard all across the auto industry.
Chevrolet’s selling point in technology would also be the Gen. II’s undoing. OptiSpark was plagued with reliability problems that troubled Corvettes, Camaros, and other GM models in the 1990s. Oil leaks around the water pump drive not only spotted driveways, but Chevrolet’s great reputation for reliability and performance. Between GM’s efforts, and the aftermarket’s, these problems aren’t as bad as they used to be. However, they have to be a priority for your LT1 build. Your job is to build a trouble-free LT1/LT4.
Despite the LT1’s engineering shortcomings up front, it was a terrific factory small block sporting a nodular iron crank, powdered metal “cracked” connecting rods, and hypereutectic pistons. In 1992, the LT1 yielded 300 hp. By the end of production in 1997, it was making 330 factory ponies in the powerful LT4.
GM made two types of Gen II LT1 blocks in the 1990s—two-bolt main and four-bolt main. Four-bolt main versions were factory installed in Corvettes mostly. However—expect to see the four-bolt main LT block in nearly anything built in the 1990s. Because they both have the same casting number of “327” they are impossible to confirm without removing the oil pan.
Although most 1992-97 LT1 engines had aluminum heads, it is important to remember there are LT1s with iron heads found in full-size GM sedans of the era. The Caprices had similar-looking 265 c.i.d. small-blocks (L99) that resemble the LT1. These engines are easily identified by their smaller 3.740-inch bores and iron heads. Don’t accidentally pick one of these up for your LT1 build project.
When we decided to build a Gen. II LT1 383 stroker, we understood it was a significant turning point in the small-block Chevy’s 37-year history. It would also be the small-block Chevrolet’s curtain call—the end of a very successful design run that would end on a mass scale at the 42-year mark.
Truth is, Chevrolet never really stopped building small blocks because they’re still available as crate engines from Chevrolet Performance. And if you’re really into numbers, Chevy has built well in excess of 90 million small blocks since 1955. It is easily the most common V8 engine ever produced and distributed around the world.
We’re building a solid, reliable LT1 383 c.i.d. stroker to see just how much power we can make from GM’s LT1 5.7L engine.
Mark Jeffrey of Trans Am Racing in Gardena, CA volunteered to build our LT1 turned LT4, with the objective being 450 hp, with a broad, stump-pulling torque curve. Mark had Air Flow Research cylinder heads in mind for our LT1 build along with an aggressive street cam package that would be good for both the commute and racetrack.
However, the car’s owner wanted a stealthy—stock in appearance, using as many genuine GM parts as we could muster on the surface. We copped LT4 heads and induction from Chevrolet Performance, which were available at the time this engine was built in 2005. Thanks to a 383 c.i.d. stroker kit from Coast High Performance, a hot roller cam kit from COMP Cams, and custom port and bowl work from Mark Jeffrey at Trans Am Racing, we were able to take a 300-horse LT1 and make 475 hp. Imagine what you could do with AFR heads— which would push it way over 500 horsepower.
Let’s get started.
LT1/LT4 Cylinder Head Types
GM produced a number of LT1 cylinder heads during the 1990s. Here’s how they stack up. Be careful when shopping for these heads—there were eight different aluminum cylinder head castings produced for the LT1/LT4. LT1/LT4 heads employ rail-style self-aligning rocker arms similar to the LS.
What’s more, the valve covers employ bolts through the center of the cover unlike perimeter style bolts on the small block Chevy and even early LS engines. Keep squarely in mind LT1 heads and intake do not interchange with LT4. If you have LT4 heads, you must use the LT4 intake. What makes the LT4 head and induction better is improved port flow and greater compression.
LT1/LT4 Aluminum Head Identification
|Type||Specifics||Model Year||Displacement||GM Casting Number|
Chamber Size 53cc
Chamber Size 53cc
Chamber Size 53cc
Chamber Size 53cc
Chamber Size 52cc
Chamber Size 52cc