What’s the difference between a torque-to-yield bolt and a torque-angle bolt? I see these bolts used with newer engines. Are they the same thing? I’ve also heard that you’re not supposed to reuse these bolts. Is that true? Thanks


Jeff Smith: First and most importantly, let’s distinguish between what we’re talking about. Your first reference is to a torque-to-yield bolt. Your second reference is to torque-angle, which is not a bolt but a procedure used for tightening a fastener. So the first is a fastener, the second is a process. What’s confusing is that TTY fasteners are very often tightened using the torque-angle method. Let’s get into the details on torqueing fasteners and the critical differences involved with each. This is important stuff to know if you work on newer engines that use different torque procedures and unique fasteners.

Let’s start by looking at what we are trying to accomplish by tightening a fastener. Obviously, we have two components we are attempting to join – like a cylinder head to a block or a rod cap on a connecting rod. The time-honored approach has been to use a torque wrench to accurately establish a pre-determined load. Let’s use the example of tightening a head bolt. The amount of torque applied to the fastener is proportional to how much load we want to apply to the head gasket to ensure that it seals. The amount of torque applied to the head bolt accomplishes two things. First, it overcomes friction between the threads in the block and the bolt as well as friction between the cylinder head the underside of the bolt head. Secondly, the torque stretches the fastener slightly to establish and maintain the desired clamp load on the gasket.

When tightening the fastener, the amount of friction created depends on multiple factors. Lubrication, like engine oil, applied to the threads and underneath the bolt head drastically decreases the amount of friction created compared to dry components. Using a moly lubricant can drastically change this value as well. The engineers at Automotive Racing Products (ARP) have found that when using engine oil, the amount of friction changes as the fastener is torqued through several cycles.

It’s critical to understand that only 10 to 15 percent of torque applied to a bolt is used to create the expected clamp load. The rest (roughly 85 percent) is required to overcome friction. This is a shocking percentage. In real world terms, if a head bolt needs 65 ft.-lbs. of torque to apply the proper load to the head gasket, then only 10 ft.-lbs. is really needed to pre-load the bolt. The rest (55 ft.-lbs.) is used to overcome friction. What this really points out is that using different lubricants will cause uncontrolled variables when attempting to create a stable load – which is counter-productive. If there was a way to eliminate friction, we’d only need to torque head bolts to 10 ft.-lbs. and the head gasket would seal no problem. That should get your attention.


This is a torque-angle gauge used on an iron block 6.0L engine. Once the initial torque spec is achieved, the fastener is then tightened to a specified angle like 60 or 80 degrees. In this case, the initial torque is 15 ft-lbs followed by an 80 degree turn of the breaker bar.

The desired bolt pre-load is very important and is a value created by the bolt manufacturer. For any bolt, the combination of the strength of its material, diameter, thread, and length all play important roles in establishing the proper fastener stretch. This desired stretch is the amount of pre-load that the bolt is designed to accommodate and still return to its original length without compromising its strength. You can think of a bolt like a spring. As long as you don’t over-stretch the spring, it will always return to its original shape. If the bolt is over-torqued and stretched beyond its limit, this exceeds its yield strength which means it can no longer maintain the needed clamp load and must be replaced.

One way to overcome the huge variable of friction when tightening fasteners like head bolts is to use a technique called torque angle. This differs from applying a simple torque. In torque angle, the first step is to establish an accurate starting point by applying a light torque to the bolt. With an LS engine inboard main cap bolt, for example, the first step is to torque each bolt to 15 ft.-lbs. At this low level, friction is not a major factor so the error induced by different lubes is minimal.

The second step is to use a torque-angle gauge that employs a small arm connected to a gauge stop. With the stop resting against a solid portion of the engine so it won’t move, the dial that can then be easily set at 0 degrees. Finally, using a breaker bar, the bolt is tightened, which moves the dial to the specified angle – hence the term torque-angle. In the case of the LS main cap bolt, with a preload of 15 ft.-lbs., the torque-angle for the inner bolt is 80 degrees. The number of degrees establishes the clamp load by ignoring the actual torque required to overcome friction.

So torque-angle is not affected by the amount of friction created by the under-head bolt thread friction. Of course, if you change fasteners like converting to ARP bolts, then that torque angle spec cannot be used since the ARP’s fasteners are made from a much stronger steel. ARP supplies a specific torque to use instead while also specifying its own ARP Ultra-Torque thread lubricant. Using this lubricant creates a much more accurate and repeatable amount of friction. This creates a much more accurate clamp load.

Another variable that directly affects normal torque values is accuracy of the torque wrench. It’s typical for a torque wrench to only be most accurate in one particular torque range. This is exactly how a torque wrench is calibrated. It’s easy to see how big problems could be created by a wrench that under-torques fasteners by perhaps 8 to 10 ft.-lbs. when the spec calls for 65 ft.-lbs.

Torque-to-yield (TTY) fasteners are a completely different style of fastener that have come into vogue with 21st Century engines. These fasteners are commonly torqued into place using a torque-angle method, but that’s where the similarities end. TTY fasteners are designed to stretch to a certain yield point and not exceed this clamp load limit. This tends to stabilize the load for a head gasket, as an example, when the engine is both cold and then as it warms up – especially it the engine is all aluminum where material growth is a concern.

This graph from Federal-Mogul illustrates why TTY fasteners can be far more efficient and apply better load than normal fasteners if employed properly. We do not know of any way to identify a TTY fastener by looking at it.

This graph from Federal-Mogul illustrates why TTY fasteners can be far more efficient and apply better load than normal fasteners if employed properly. We do not know of any way to identify a TTY fastener by looking at it.

However, this potentially more consistent clamp load  comes at a price since TTY bolts are designed for one-time use only. GM LS engine head bolts, for example, are TTY fasteners that can only be used once. If the heads are removed, new bolts should be used to ensure proper load.

So the point of all this besides educating you on fasteners, is that any bolt can be tightened with a torque-angle specification, but that does not mean that it necessarily is a TTY bolt. You should also not assume that a TTY fastener will always be torqued with the torque-angle method. Engines have become far more sophisticated in the 21st Century and that includes how they are assembled. The simple torque spec is not dead, but there are various ways to establish load that can be far more accurate.

Share this Article
Author: Jeff Smith

Jeff Smith has had a passion for cars since he began working at his grandfather's gas station at the age 10. After graduating from Iowa State University with a journalism degree in 1978, he combined his two passions: cars and writing. Smith began writing for Car Craft magazine in 1979 and became editor in 1984. In 1987, he assumed the role of editor for Hot Rod magazine before returning to his first love of writing technical stories. Since 2003, Jeff has held various positions at Car Craft (including editor), has written books on small block Chevy performance, and even cultivated an impressive collection of 1965 and 1966 Chevelles. Now he serves as a regular contributor to OnAllCylinders.